Evaluation of DILI Predictive Hypotheses in Early Drug Development.

Chan R, Benet LZ, et al.

Chemical research in toxicology. Mar 2017.

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a leading cause of drug failure in clinical trials and a major reason for drug withdrawals. DILI has been shown to be dependent on both daily dose and extent of hepatic metabolism. Yet, early in drug development daily dose is unknown. Here, we perform a comprehensive analysis of the published hypotheses that attempt to predict DILI, including a new analysis of the Biopharmaceutics Drug Disposition Classification System (BDDCS) in evaluating the severity of DILI warning in drug labels approved by the FDA and the withdrawal status due to ADRs. Our analysis confirms that higher doses ≥ 50mg/day lead to increased DILI potential but this property alone is not sufficient to predict DILI potential. We evaluate prior attempts to categorize DILI such as Rule of 2, BSEP inhibition, and measures of key mechanisms of toxicity compared to BDDCS classification. Our results show that BDDCS Class 2 drugs exhibit the highest DILI severity, and that all of the published methodologies evaluated here, except when daily dose is known, do not yield markedly better prediction than BDDCS. The assertion that extensive metabolized compounds are at higher risk of developing DILI is confirmed, but can be enhanced by differentiating BDDCS Class 2 from Class 1 drugs. We do not propose that BDDCS classification, which does not require knowledge of the clinical dose, is sufficiently predictive/accurate of DILI potential for new molecular entities, but suggest that comparison of proposed DILI prediction methodologies with BDDCS classification is a useful tool to evaluate the potential reliability of newly proposed algorithms.The most successful approaches to predict DILI potential all include a measure of dose, yet there is a quantifiable uncertainty associated with the predicted dose early in drug development. Here we compare the possibility of predicting DILI potential using BDDCS classification versus previously published methods, and suggest that comparison of predictive metrics versus the outcome by just avoiding BDDCS Class 2 drugs may serve as a useful baseline in evaluating these metrics.

Pubmed

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *